On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:30:18 +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > seems invalid, the module is an interface for v4l, not v4l2, so this is at > > best wishlist for a new module, certainly not a bug. > > note that the suggested libv4l is supposed to work just fine with the module > > (according to libv4l docs). > So it seems to me we want to patch this so it uses v4l1_* functions > from libv4l? (http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/3636.html pointed in > the initial bug message).
Ack, and it's probably not difficult for someone who speaks C. > Or drop the package, but this will also bring down ivtv-utils, which > depends on V::C::V4L and has about 300 popcon score :/ Ack, I'd try to avoid the removal. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG Key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Donovan: Wynken Blynken And Nod
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
