Your message dated Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:36:27 +0100
with message-id <201002172236.27340.debbug.10.drinkm...@spamgourmet.com>
and subject line directvnc: should this package be removed?
has caused the Debian Bug report #553887,
regarding directvnc: should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
553887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=553887
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: directvnc
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Dead/missing upstream.
* Buggy.
* ITA'd for over 3 years.
* No reverse depends/build-depends.
* Low popcon scores.
If you disagree and want to continue to maintain this package, please
just close this bug and do an upload also fixing the other issues.
If you agree that it should be removed, send the following commands to
cont...@bugs.debian.org (replace nnnnnn with this bug's number):
severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: <packagename> -- RoM; <reasons>
thanks
For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
0.7.6-1 has been uploaded to sid, so to me, the issues that were reported in
this
bug are now solved. Therefore, I am closing this bug.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/directvnc/directvnc_0.7.6-1/changelog#versionversion0.7.6-1
--- End Message ---
