Hi, On Friday 29 January 2010 16.44:28 Simon Josefsson wrote: > zeromq-2.0-beta2/foreign/openpgm/libpgm-2.0.20rc5.tar.bz2:libpgm-2.0.20 > rc5/openpgm/doc/draft-ietf-rmt-bb-pgmcc-03.txt > zeromq-2.0-beta2/foreign/openpgm/libpgm-2.0.20rc5.tar.bz2:libpgm-2.0.20r > c5/openpgm/doc/rfc3208.txt
Thanks for the report. It'll be fixed one way or the other with the next
upload. I'm currently waiting for feedback from the openpgm folks. I wasn't
aware that rfc authos can re-license, I'll ping them (I blindly assumed that
IETF cntrols this.)
cheers
-- vbi
--
Lenny will have significantly better Debian support than Etch.
-- Russel Coker
A few hours later correcting himself with:
It is unfortunately easy when using many technical terms to dereference
the wrong mental pointer. In the above I meant to say "Lenny will have
significantly better SE Linux support than Etch".
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
