Your message dated Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:52:45 +0000
with message-id <e1naosz-0002dl...@golconda.cs.nuim.ie>
and subject line Re: Bug#567361: djview4: FTBFS: Tricky Build-Depends?
has caused the Debian Bug report #567361,
regarding djview4: FTBFS: Tricky Build-Depends?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
567361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567361
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: djview4
Version: 4.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package fails on the buildds, presumably because the Build-Depends
are confusing:
| […] imagemagick, imagemagick (<= 7:6.5.5.3-1) | libmagickcore3-extra |
libmagickcore2-extra | libwmf-bin
So, imagemagick gets pulled, but its version is too high, so the first
part of the alternative isn't fulfilled, and it breaks:
| After installing, the following source dependencies are still unsatisfied:
| imagemagick(inst 7:6.5.8.3-1 ! <= wanted
7:6.5.5.3-1)|libmagickcore3-extra(missing)|libmagickcore2-extra(missing)|libwmf-bin(missing)
Things could be smarter, but as it is, your package FTBFS on the
buildds, so here's your bug. :)
Full build logs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=djview4
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.5-5
Reordered disjunction of build dependencies, thus working around
dependency satisfaction incompetence of the autobuilder software.
--- End Message ---
