Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:17:41 +0000 (WET)
with message-id <20100124231741.1d7ec14...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package libroxen-watchdog has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #565794,
regarding libroxen-watchdog: should this package be removed?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
565794: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libroxen-watchdog
Severity: serious
Justification: orphaned, zero popcon, inactive upstream
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: proposed-removal
libroxen-watchdog seems like a candidate for removal from Debian:
* orphaned since September
* low popcon (no votes)
* no upstream source since 2007, according to debian/changelog
If you want to keep this package around in Debian, please adopt it and close
this bug.
If you don't think it's worth keeping, please send the following commands
to cont...@bugs.debian.org, replacing nnnnnn with this bug's number:
severity nnnnnn normal
reassign nnnnnn ftp.debian.org
retitle nnnnnn RM: libroxen-watchdog -- RoQA; orphaned, no popcon, upstream
vanished
thanks
For more information, see
http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals
http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals.txt
Regards,
smcv
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0-11+rm
You filled the bug http://bugs.debian.org/565794 in Debian BTS
against the package libroxen-watchdog. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/566447. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
