Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:41:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323722: maintainer seems MIA, we should orphan this
package.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 06:48:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 23:48:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp12.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.20]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5eCI-0000er-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:48:18 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf1202.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id F22221C000A0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-16-183.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr
[82.126.206.183])
by mwinf1202.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A3BF41C00088
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:47:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E5e9V-0002fH-Qj; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:45:25 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:45:20 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: maintainer seems MIA, we should orphan this package.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: progsreiserfs
Severity: grave
Hi all,
The previous maintainer, (which was not even a DD), has not been active since
forever (well july 2004), and his email address bounces. Given that he did
only one upload since timshell knoll left the debian project, and progreiserfs
has an RC bug open since forever, it would be great if someone else would take
over or something.
There are a couple of fixes, probably for the RC bug even, in the
[email protected] mailing lists, from the progreiserfs author himself.
I personally don't want to take over porgreiserfs, since i am already saddled
with parted i didn't really wish to maintain. That said, it would be nice to
reenable progreiserfs support in parted, which is why progreiserfs fixed those
bugs.
Anyway, just wanted to bring this to the attention of the general public, not
sure if this is the best way.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:34:20 +0200
X-Sieve: Server Sieve 2.2
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-me-spamlevel: not-spam
X-me-spamrating: 37.194863
X-Spam: no; 0.00; wanadoo:01 wanadoo:01 jltallon:01 unavailable:01 dnsbl:01
lookup:01 l'anti-virus:01 detecte:01 libreiserfs:01 libreiserfs:01 sarge:01
fix:01 parted:01 upstream:01 sven:01
Content-Description: Notification
This is the SMTP Server program at host wanadoo.fr.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The SMTP Server program
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.adv-solutions.net[213.139.24.154] said:
554 Service unavailable; Client host [193.252.22.28] blocked using
dnsbl.sorbs.net; Spam Received See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?193.252.22.28 (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wanadoo vous informe que cet e-mail a ete controle par l'anti-virus mail.
Aucun virus connu a ce jour par nos services n'a ete detecte.
Content-Description: Delivery report
Reporting-MTA: dns; wanadoo.fr
X-SMTP-Server-Queue-ID: B79E220000A0
X-SMTP-Server-Sender: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arrival-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 08:31:30 +0200 (CEST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-SMTP-Server; host mail.adv-solutions.net[213.139.24.154]
said: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [193.252.22.28] blocked using
dnsbl.sorbs.net; Spam Received See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?193.252.22.28 (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libreiserfs maintainership ...
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
You have taken over libreiserfs maintainership last year, but since then not
much has happened, and libreiserfs was kicked out of sarge because of an
unhandled bug report.
I am wondering what your status is with regard to libreiserfs, if you don't
want or have time to handle it, maybe you should officially orphan it, so
others can take over or something ?
There are a couple of patch , which may or not fix your RC bug in the parted
mailing list, from the libreiserfs upstream.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
----- End forwarded message -----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323722-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 09:41:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 02:41:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.38]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5guM-0000T1-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:41:58 -0700
Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 379FF3AE8; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:41:57 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug#323722: maintainer seems MIA, we should orphan this package.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:45:20AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> The previous maintainer, (which was not even a DD), has not been=20
> active since forever (well july 2004), and his email address bounces.
> Given that he did only one upload since timshell knoll left the debian
> project, and progreiserfs has an RC bug open since forever, it would
> be great if someone else would take over or something.
> There are a couple of fixes, probably for the RC bug even, in the
> [email protected] mailing lists, from the progreiserfs author himself.
> I personally don't want to take over porgreiserfs, since i am already=20
> saddled with parted i didn't really wish to maintain. That said, it
> would be nice to reenable progreiserfs support in parted, which is why
> progreiserfs fixed those bugs.
> Anyway, just wanted to bring this to the attention of the general=20
> public, not sure if this is the best way.
No. Packages are not maintainers; please do not file bugs against
packages which are not package bugs.
If the maintainer is truly MIA, then the correct course of action would
be to contact debian-qa, and have the package orphaned via a bug report
against the wnpp pseudopackage. But it seems, from subsequent emails,
that the maintainer is MIA. In any case, filing an RC bug about the
fact that the package *has* an RC bug is definitely wrong.
--=20
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDBFflKN6ufymYLloRAuLdAJ0X9rP25xSXhEd3PJ7e4/TPvbeznwCfXYE6
CDsp+gq+mlDqi/JKGNaQQ+4=
=buRk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
