On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:09:42 +0100, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote:
> 1. reply to RC bugs filed against your packages;
I haven't received any mail about RC bugs today, and can't find any
through the bugs.debian.org web interface.
> 2. optionally fix them;
I'm trying, but it looks like dh_installdefoma is just plain busted
though. It does things like:
test -x `which defoma-app` && defoma-app clean fontconfig
which is clearly broken when defoma-app is not installed (as test -x
with no argument returns success)
> 3. or acknowledge NMUs instead of trashing the related changes, and
> triggering again RC bugs that were worked around, leading to
> uninstallable packages, broken buildds, etc.
I rashly assumed that the only issue with defoma was in the code I had
written, not in that added by dh_installdefoma.
> I've just uploaded a package re-introducing Riku's changes to prevent
> buildds to be fucked again after a couple of builds (which I repeat
> needs manual intervention, which is not nice).
Thanks; I've got a defoma patch that I'm testing here; can you suggest a
method to test the resulting fontconfig patches built with that change?
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpp7R9YoqQO4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
