On 29/12/09 at 12:22 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:19:38 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > > # Failed test 'Creating IO::Socket::Multicast6 object'
> > > # at t/00use.t line 11.
> > > Can't call method "close" on an undefined value at t/00use.t line 15.
> > > # Looks like you planned 3 tests but ran 2.
> > > # Looks like you failed 1 test of 2 run.
> > > # Looks like your test exited with 2 just after 2.
> > > t/00use.t ........
> > > Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
> > > Failed 2/3 subtests
>
> That's an interesting bug again :)
>
> My test results so far:
>
> * Desktop machine, i386, sid, sid cowbuilder chroot, 2.6.32, ipv6 up
> and running: builds.
> * Laptop, i386, sid, sid cowbuilder chroot, 2.6.32, ipv6 only
> Scope:Link: triggers a _different_ bug in the test suite, patch
> committed to svn. Builds with this patch.
> * Server, amd64, lenny, sid cowbuilder _and_ sid pbuilder chroot,
> 2.6.26, ipv6 only Scope:Link: fails like described in this
> bugreport.
> * Openmoko, armel, sid, sid cowbuilder chroot, 2.6.29, ipv6 only
> Scope:Link: fails like described in this bugreport.
>
> ## Scratch the above. ##
>
> The perl debugger led me to:
>
> IO::Socket::INET6::_sock_info(/usr/share/perl5/IO/Socket/INET6.pm:73):
> 73: if(@proto = getprotobyname($proto)) {
> DB<1>
> IO::Socket::INET6::_sock_info(/usr/share/perl5/IO/Socket/INET6.pm:77):
> 77: $@ = "Bad protocol '$proto'";
>
> which in turn reminded me that netbase might be a helpful package ...
Erm. netbase is not essential or build-essential, so it would make sense
to add it to Build-Depends...
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
