On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 04:13:26PM -0400, Zack Cerza wrote: > On 2005 August 13 Saturday 19:04, Steve Langasek wrote: > > So are you filing this bug because Netscape isn't mentioned in the > > copyright file, or because you actually believe we don't have a proper > > license to them? There are equivalently named files in the mozilla source > > and the mozilla-dev package, so I would be surprised if these files haven't > > in fact been relicensed under the GPL. In that case, the copyright file > > includes the correct license, it just doesn't include a complete list of > > copyright holders, and that's not really an RC bug.
> This issue was discovered during package checks by my AM. I've brought it up > with upstream, and their response consisted of "the exact same files exist in > kdebase/nsplugins" - so I went to KDE upstream with the same issue, and got a > single response_. So, no communication I've initiated has convinced me that > we have (or anyone has) a license to distribute the files in question. That > said, I could certainly be wrong and be asking the wrong people. I sincerely > hope so. > .. _response: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-core-devel&m=112314862006216&w=2 Well, as noted, there are equivalently named files in the mozilla-dev package. Perhaps it's worth checking to see if these files are identical (except for the copyright statement, perhaps), and if not, whether the KDE versions can be replaced with the Mozilla versions? Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
