On 11.12.2009 05:25, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
please note that even if the other bug (#560093) got closed, your
package still can't be built:
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| default-jdk-builddep: Depends: gcj-jdk but it is not going to be installed
| E: Broken packages
(This is sid/amd64.)
Logging into the chroot, I'm getting this:
$ apt-get install -s default-jdk-builddep
→ fine.
$ apt-get install -s default-jdk-builddep gjdoc
→ default-jdk-builddep: Depends: gcj-jdk but it is not going to be installed
$ apt-get install -s default-jdk-builddep gcj-jdk
→ fine.
So it appears to me that having gcj-jdk provide gjdoc isn't
sufficient, since apt-get prefers the real package over the provided
one, stumbles upon some conflicts, and fails to figure out a solution;
while there are clearly “easy” ones.
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2009/12/msg00756.html
I'm Cc-ing -java@, they might tweak some package relationships to help
package managers figure out a solution.
I would prefer to see gjdoc being removed for the release, if possible. for the
packages build-depending it for now, just remove it from the b-d's and make sure
that javadoc is used instead of gjdoc. If for some reason, you need it
explicitely, maybe b-d on gcj-jdk | gjdoc. The list of packages are:
aspectj babel jaminid jesd jmdns libcsv-java libjibx-java mina trilead-ssh2
weirdx
I'll care about gcj-4.3, and classpath should use the just built gjdoc like the
gcj-4.4 build does.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
