On 11/29/2009 09:08 AM, Felix Zielcke wrote: > In the 24-1 one there was a syntax error in it which completely broke > our parser. But unfortunately nobody thought that the grub.cfg could be > just wrong and not the C code in GRUB itself. > After having successfully rebooted today with 24-2, i took a security copy of the properly working grub.cfg, and installed 25-1, making sure that grub.cfg is updated. After that i compared both with each other, and there was not a single difference.
> We have already a debconf prompt for this. But it seems that people > either don't see it or just don't care about it etc. > Hmmm, so maybe here we have the issue? If running grub-install again is definitely required for a workable boot configuration, then this might be the point where it fails. I never saw any debconf prompt, and thus didn't recognize the need to run grub-install. I have had configured debconf to never ask me any questions with a priority less than medium. But even after setting it to the lowest possible option i was not shown any prompt asking to run grub-install. What i did now was to manually run grub-install on the drive, in order to make sure that grub is definitely updated. And this finally resulted in a properly bootable system. Thanks for your help! Cheers P. *8^) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
