Your message dated Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:02:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321731: fixed in adeos 20050603-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2005 08:56:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 07 01:56:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (mauritius.dodds.net)
[66.93.39.86]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1gx8-0000KT-00; Sun, 07 Aug 2005 01:56:18 -0700
Received: by mauritius.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 376E3171D23; Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:56:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 01:56:18 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: adeos: FTBFS: builds arch-dependent package in arch-independent target
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: adeos
Version: 20050603-1
Severity: serious
The adeos source package is failing to build on all autobuilders with the
following error:
/usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
dh_clean -k
dh_installdirs
dh_installkpatches
dh_install
## nothing to do here, with change to "Architecture: all" moved everything =
to binary-indep
dpkg-genchanges -B -mDebian Build Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent pack=
ages
dpkg-genchanges: binary-only upload - not including any source code
dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot open upload file
=2E./kernel-patch-adeos_20050603-1_arm.deb for reading: No such file or dir=
ectory
The comment in debian/rules is a cute touch, given that the package is *not*
listed as Architecture: all in debian/control. :)
Cheers,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC9cyxKN6ufymYLloRAnshAJ9u5rGJredMZKjhGn0BxH0mjRBc0wCcCgu7
pXLgt3gU60eTLLBttvf2p7w=
=2XaI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Bu8it7iiRSEf40bY--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 321731-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 12:09:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 09 05:09:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2So1-0003PA-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:02:05 -0700
From: Edelhard Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#321731: fixed in adeos 20050603-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 05:02:05 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: adeos
Source-Version: 20050603-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
adeos, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
adeos_20050603-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/a/adeos/adeos_20050603-2.diff.gz
adeos_20050603-2.dsc
to pool/main/a/adeos/adeos_20050603-2.dsc
kernel-patch-adeos_20050603-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/a/adeos/kernel-patch-adeos_20050603-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Edelhard Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated adeos package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:27:58 +0200
Source: adeos
Binary: kernel-patch-adeos
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20050603-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Edelhard Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Edelhard Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
kernel-patch-adeos - ADEOS nanokernel for sharing hardware resources
Closes: 321731
Changes:
adeos (20050603-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* moved all stuff from binary-indep to binary-arch target and removed all
binary-indep dependencies in debian/rules (Closes: #321731)
Files:
58775c69608c677ad295f5120b5740e6 618 devel extra adeos_20050603-2.dsc
c4b2e74bdf6603512ffcd69ffb5df471 4951 devel extra adeos_20050603-2.diff.gz
d1ae90e6b0f9c111a489d3f21f5ccd24 1254322 devel extra
kernel-patch-adeos_20050603-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC+JdRlByGkm8iLx8RArzMAJ9TBfL+fPbvY7C81IwO5n3PTMV0fQCaAwin
9Tfv9B8zs6fffbPvaw8Oeew=
=rkRp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
