Your message dated Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:43:42 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #548199,
regarding broken maintainer address
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
548199: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548199
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: newt
Severity: serious

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Datum: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:58:17 +0000
Von: Mail Delivery System <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  [email protected]
    retry timeout exceeded

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <[email protected]>
Received: from dak by ries.debian.org with local (Exim 4.69)
        (envelope-from <[email protected]>)
        id 1MqnUa-0004s2-87; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:32:12 +0000
From: Archive Administrator <[email protected]>
To: Steffen Joeris <[email protected]>, Alastair McKinstry
<[email protected]>
X-DAK: dak process-unchecked
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
X-Debian: DAK
X-Debian-Package: newt
Precedence: junk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: newt override disparity
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:32:12 +0000

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libnewt0.52_0.52.2-11.3+lenny1_i386.deb: package says section is base,
override says libs.
python-newt_0.52.2-11.3+lenny1_i386.deb: package says priority is
standard, override says optional.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.

Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:

Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority

Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.


[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug
and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail.  Your bug
needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until
then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [email protected])



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- There were DNS problems on the domain, due to a recent change in hardware.
The email address is now working correctly.

Regards
Alastair McKinstry


--
Alastair McKinstry  , <[email protected]> , <[email protected]>    
http://blog.sceal.ie

Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world
is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist.





--- End Message ---

Reply via email to