On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:47:51 +0100 Julian Gilbey <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:27:20AM -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:27:38 +0100 Julian Gilbey > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm bemused, incidentally, how your package ever built > > > successfully on i386. Perhaps there was a change in the cdbs > > > package or something like that? > > > > The problem only manifests itself during a binary-arch build, and > > doesn't happen during a full package build. > > Not true, it seems - it happened to me during a full package build. > Here's a second attempt at a diff to debian/rules; does this work for > you? It fixes the problems you identified, although it does leave in > the removal of info and makefiles. Odd. From what I can tell, it *should* have been fine for a full package build. Maybe some ordering was changed somewhere. Ruben (who co-maintains the package) has looked at this, and has prepared a new version based on your patch, plus some other fixes. I'll try to look at his package soon. -- Hubert Chathi - Email/Jabber: [email protected] - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA (Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
