Your message dated Sat, 06 Aug 2005 08:02:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#320193: fixed in libselinux 1.24-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jul 2005 14:44:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 27 07:44:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from neualius.turmzimmer.net [217.160.169.58]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1Dxn9F-0000Pi-00; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 07:44:41 -0700
Received: from [10.2.3.1] (helo=eos.turmzimmer.net)
by neualius.turmzimmer.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dxn9E-0003I5-DG
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:44:40 +0200
Received: from aba by eos.turmzimmer.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dxn99-0001Ud-8r
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:44:35 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:44:35 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: doesn't compile on ia64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libselinux
Version: 1.24-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
the most recent version of libselinux doesn't compile on ia64 with the
following error:
cc -Wall -I../include -D_GNU_SOURCE setupns.c -L../src -lselinux -o setupns
setupns.c:17: error: syntax error before "clone"
setupns.c:22: warning: return type defaults to `int'
It seems that this is because of ia64-specific way how syscalls are
done. I already prodded Lamont whether he has some ideas, and sent him
details by mail.
Unfortunatly, this holds up e.g. xorg from entering testing.
Cheers,
Andi
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 320193-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 15:08:44 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 08:08:44 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E1QBa-0000a6-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 08:02:06 -0700
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#320193: fixed in libselinux 1.24-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 08:02:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: libselinux
Source-Version: 1.24-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libselinux, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libselinux1-dev_1.24-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libs/libselinux/libselinux1-dev_1.24-2_i386.deb
libselinux1_1.24-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libs/libselinux/libselinux1_1.24-2_i386.deb
libselinux_1.24-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/libs/libselinux/libselinux_1.24-2.diff.gz
libselinux_1.24-2.dsc
to pool/main/libs/libselinux/libselinux_1.24-2.dsc
selinux-utils_1.24-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/libs/libselinux/selinux-utils_1.24-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libselinux package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 09:24:12 -0500
Source: libselinux
Binary: libselinux1-dev selinux-utils libselinux1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.24-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libselinux1 - SELinux shared libraries
libselinux1-dev - SELinux development headers
selinux-utils - SELinux utility programs
Closes: 320193
Changes:
libselinux (1.24-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bug fix: "doesn't compile on ia64", thanks to Andreas
Barth. Apparently, we cannot use __clone2 because it requires a callback
and automatically invokes _exit in the child. Even if we used longjmp
to work around this problem, we are still using an internal GNU libc
interface. So, we include a GNU libc excerpt to implement a clone
look alike for IA64. Thanks to Florian Weimer for the fix.
(Closes: #320193).
Files:
048aa64d31ea1da7a83df1c1ee4dc94f 594 libs optional libselinux_1.24-2.dsc
470be4fb83844fc86785115c730739ad 38426 libs optional libselinux_1.24-2.diff.gz
c6e8dd41c756d3b987895337c917b5b9 36574 libs optional
selinux-utils_1.24-2_i386.deb
4be251f342f97a37b62106a3bf3d1d92 46158 base required
libselinux1_1.24-2_i386.deb
8e39fd2594641e4acbae7ec528b3bdeb 169606 libs optional
libselinux1-dev_1.24-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC9M16Ibrau78kQkwRAp6uAKDXNh90IZdeoJJnX+M0PGGA/Kg+5wCdFe0N
G0ICBzykDDHRd+OzXMN/GiQ=
=3uMS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
