"Artur R. Czechowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:45:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> OTOH, it seems incorrect to list 1.3.1-9 as the version that this
>> bug was fixed in since 1.3.1-9 is the version still awaiting
>> removal. That seems like a minor point to me, though.
> Is there a better way to do it with new version tracking subsystem in BTS?
I would be interested to know. I used the last known version, because
there didn't seem to be a sensible alternative (and as I've already
been admonished for leaving the version blank, I didn't want to repeat
that offence ;-).
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
