On April 13, 2009 11:14:12 Lennart Sorensen wrote: > That is no longer a complete set of headers and you can't build > against it like that. The kernel team says that is no longer > supported. > > > This is what I've done for a long time (changing the kernel in > > question each time, obviously). > > Why not use module-assitant? I sure didn't test that old way of > doing it when I rewrote the build scripts. > > I used module-assistant and a hacked up version of > linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 and both worked. > > I did not test make-kpkg or doing it manually (which I stopped doing > years ago when I discovered module-assistant).
I guess I'll switch to module-assistant - not a problem. But as was pointed out elsewhere, it might be best to make the requirement explicit. Cheers, Christopher Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
