This one time, at band camp, Roger Leigh wrote: >Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:34:14AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:53:01AM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > >>> > Also, last I checked, contacting the maintainer was a required step in an >>> > NMU. When were you planning on letting me know your intentions? >> >>> This package was one of a list of packages I was asked to fix by the >>> RM. 0-day NMUs are also OK for GCC 4.0 FTBFS bugs, apparently. >> >> Nothing I say trumps the requirement to inform maintainers about the changes >> you're making to their packages and to make certain for yourself that the >> NMU is warranted and correct. Please read this as implicit in any >> suggestions I make regarding NMU candidates. > >Please both accept my apologies. I'll make sure to do that in the >future.
Ok, no problem. I was merely surprised to find an upload without any mention in the bug report about the intention, and I had not had any coffee. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
