On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 07:10:26PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:44:46PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> hi Steve, > > Under the 0-day NMU policy for the C++ ABI transition, I have prepared an > > NMU for boost, because its C++ library packages need to be rebuilt so that a > > number of other C++-based packages can transition to g++ 4.0. The diff for > > this NMU is attached; the NMU will be uploaded shortly. If you see any > > problems with the patch, let me know so I can have the package rejected out > > of NEW. > i thought my statements in #318139 were clear, i'm working on boost > 1.33.0 prelease packages which solve also the transition to g++ 4.0. i'm > then surprised to see your NMU, as if you forgot everything... > IMHO such NMU is not necessary, the fixed version of boost 1.32.0 is going > to live few days anyway. haven't you anything more important to do? :)) The maintainer of a package which depends on boost asked me for it, and yes, I forgot about the discussion in 318139. Please feel free to upload your own version of the package. :) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
