Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:17:26 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318926: gettext-base package not renamed for C++ ABI change
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2005 16:56:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 09:56:55 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DuYvH-0007QU-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:56:55 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA05778
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:56:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BB5F2B0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:56:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 02766-02 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:56:52 +0200 (MEST) 13989
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:56:51 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j6IGupi5006347;
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:56:51 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:56:51 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gettext-base package not renamed for C++ ABI change
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gettext-base
Version: 0.14.5-2
Severity: serious
the libasprintf library contained in gettext-base is built for the new
C++ ABI. IMO you cannot use the same package name.
Maybe a correct solution is to split the library into a separate
libasprintf0c2 package and keep the -dev files in the gettext-base
package.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 318926-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2005 18:18:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 11:18:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pizarro.unex.es [158.49.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DuaCM-0005kx-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:18:38 -0700
Received: from localhost (almendralejo.unex.es [158.49.8.199])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
id 9851AA1D19; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:18:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pizarro.unex.es ([158.49.8.2])
by localhost (emilio [158.49.17.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 27567-04; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:20:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from guadiana.unex.es (guadiana.unex.es [158.49.17.23])
by pizarro.unex.es (Postfix/MJ-1.08) with ESMTP
id 4DD41A1D44; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:18:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from cantor.unex.es ([158.49.18.105])
by guadiana.unex.es with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DuaCK-0007d8-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:18:36 +0200
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:17:26 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#318926: gettext-base package not renamed for C++ ABI change
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at unex.es
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: gettext-base
> Version: 0.14.5-2
> Severity: serious
>
> the libasprintf library contained in gettext-base is built for the new
> C++ ABI. IMO you cannot use the same package name.
Yes, I can, because packages linked to libasprintf depend (via the
dpkg-shlibdeps mechanism) on the library provided by gettext-base,
*not* on gettext-base itself, and I have renamed the library provided
by gettext-base and modified accordingly the shlibs file.
I fully agree that it would be a serious bug if packages linked to
libasprintf just had a Depends: gettext-base, but that's not the case.
Moreover, AFAIK, there is not a single package in Debian using this
library yet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
