Hi, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > The problem of dropping Iceape is that it provides a Xulrunner -dev package, > iceape-dev, based on Xulrunner 1.8, while Xulrunner in Lenny (the one that
uhm, wasn't the rationale for using iceape-dev the xulrunner 1.9 transition? E.g. http://lists.debian.org/debian-openoffice/2008/05/msg00008.html. That mail clearly says "use iceape-dev"... > openoffice.org At least 3.0 works with libxul. No idea for 2.4.1... > 1. Providing the -dev package from Icedove (which is also based on Xul 1.8) Which also will need a reupload of all those... And how does the "remove iceape[-dev]" thing correlated with the (deep) freeze we're in and only RC bugs should be fixed? Anyway, I can try to build OOo 2.4.1 using libxul... Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
