[Laszlo Boszormenyi] > In short, do you want Lenny (will be released in 2009 as it seems) to > contain a four year old piece of software which contains at least one > unpatched security bug?
No. That is why I said you should _not_ ship a "libneon25" package. By shipping a dummy "libneon25", you cause existing installed copies of neon25 to be deleted, which breaks old software that has not been recompiled. Why do you want to do this? Just stop building or shipping anything named libneon25. I still think this bug should be RC. -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
