Le mercredi 19 novembre 2008 16:30:11 Robert Millan, vous avez écrit : > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 02:19:38PM +0100, Didier Raboud wrote: > > Hi again, > > > > from reading the changelog.gz, I confirm that this should have made it to > > Lenny. After purging and reinstalling grub-pc from Lenny, 10_linux is > > still producing a similar entry as above. > > > > The mentioned bug (number ?) is then still open. I fear to try the change > > because if invaders fails, what tells me that my boot won't fail too ? > > It doesn't matter. It's a small bugfix, not worth backporting it.
It is in the changelog.gz, but the change is not in my package (my 10_linux is
attached).
> > What I see here on my laptop is that with the
> > prepare_grub_to_access_device() outside of the entries, it works and with
> > it being inside the entry for "invaders", it fails.
>
> Sounds like a GRUB bug to me. What version of grub-pc are you using? (make
> sure you have run grub-install on that version)
Done.
$ LANG=C apt-cache policy grub-pc
grub-pc:
Installed: 1.96+20080724-12
Candidate: 1.96+20080724-12
Version table:
1.96+20081108-1 0
50 ftp://mirror.switch.ch experimental/main Packages
*** 1.96+20080724-12 0
700 ftp://mirror.switch.ch testing/main Packages
600 ftp://mirror.switch.ch unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> Also, check: grep multiboot /boot/grub/command.lst
$ grep multiboot /boot/grub/command.lst
module: multiboot
multiboot: multiboot
After a closer look... The changed 10_linux is in the grub-common package in
experimental.
What stays is that in the actual state of things, grub-invaders is not bootable
with grub-pc in Lenny.
Regards,
OdyX
--
Didier Raboud, proud Debian user.
CH-1802 Corseaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10_linux
Description: application/shellscript
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
