tags 482140 + unreproducible thanks Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 22:29 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes: > Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 17:36 +0000 schrieb Debian Bug Tracking > > System: > >> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> > >>> tags 482140 - unreproducible > >> Bug#482140: docbook-xml: Package does not install: update-xmlcatalog: > >> error: entity already registered > >> Tags were: help unreproducible > >> Tags removed: unreproducible > > > > Would you be so kind to explain, why you removed the tag? If you know of > > a way to reproduce it, I would really love to hear it, because I cannot > > reproduce the problem. If you remove the tag you seem to know a way to > > reproduce it. > > If lots of people complain about the same problem, it is reproducible.
Oh really? Even those, who observed the issue were *not* able to reproduce it! Why do you change bug tags, when you even did not read the whole report?! > You seem to tag it unreproducible to not have to solve it WTF are you trying to say?! I spent several days trying to reproduce it! I again repeat it: Even people who observed the issue were not able to reproduce it! Downgrading and again upgrading worked perfectly! And everything which is now attached to this report is: "Oh yes, I also had this." Yeah, this is the information I need. Two entities are not removed. But the maintainer scripts *remove* them. So there must be a reason, why these two entities are not removed and I cannot reproduce this behaviour. I think, that the Perl upgrade maybe leave the system in a broken state, so the removal command fails. But I cannot reproduce it and I tried several upgrade orders! Another possibility is, that the package was shipped wih a CD and was broken on this CD. But reporters told me, that the maintainer scripts on their system were ok. However, re-installing the package also seems to solve the problem. And now you better shut up and try to reproduce it yourself instead trying to teach me about things, I already examined! I gave you a lot of information, which all did not help me to reproduce it. If you think, I try to *not* solve it: Well show me, how bad I maintain the package! > or find a way > to reproduce it which is not the use case of the tag AFAIK. I spent hours over hours and the tags meaning is: "This bug can't be reproduced on the maintainer's system. Assistance from third parties is needed in diagnosing the cause of the problem." This is exactly, what I'm looking for! Find a way to reproduce it and then I will remove this tag. And now stop your insulting behaviour! Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
