On 03/10/08 at 15:21 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: > Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 12:43 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit : > > It does not seem to have reverse dependencies. There are a few users > > (double digit popcon), but not exceedingly many. > > > > As it is on the servers, I assume a single mailing-list manager may have > thousands of users... so popularity contest may not be relevant here > AFAICT.
Right. I find it annoying that after the sympa-drama before the etch release, we are now likely to run into another sympa-drama. Sympa is not an unmaintained software package: upstream is active, responsive and AFAIK willing to help. There's absolutely no reason why sympa should be in a crappy state in Debian. In #354355 (the "etch sympa-drama bug"), Stefan Hornburg refused several times to consider co-maintainance for sympa. I'm not sure if Jean Charles Delepine is still interested in co-maintaining it, but maybe we should try to convince Stefan to accept co-maintainance now. Maybe we could even avoid a sympa problem before the squeeze release. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
