Hi, On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:57:14AM +0930, Ron wrote: >
[long explanation skip] Gah, in some moment i read the comment about DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR, and then forgot about it when working further in the problem. ... > It does seem to me that any fix here should not just cripple the > flavour mechanism though. I need to look in a bit more detail to > understand why you think 'the rest of the rules (are) wrong'... This comment was made assuming DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR should always have a value. And for some reason it was always being empty. It is in the debian/rules file, but if you think users might want to create their own flavours builds of your package, it would be a nice idea document how exactly doing this in the README.Debian. > So yeah. UGH. But we know a bit more about this now than we did > last week, so that's a start ... does anyone have a pointer for > me about why sbuild has done this? > My suspect is unless you can point clearly a bug about this in sbuild, you will have to adapt yout packaging :/ Happy hacking! Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
