> According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454092, > this was fixed in svn revision 34204. Current version was forked off > revision 34575.
should the package version number include the svn number to make it clear which version it was forked from? for example 1.0.1~svn34575-1? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]