> According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454092,
> this was fixed in svn revision 34204. Current version was forked off
> revision 34575.

should the package version number include the svn number to make it
clear which version it was forked from?  for example 1.0.1~svn34575-1?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to