reassign 484196 hypre reassign 484341 hypre merge 484196 484341 retitle 484196 hypre: Build-Depends is missing LAPACK, and BLAS/LAPACK libs are wrong thanks
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 22:04 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 03/06/08 at 14:44 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Hello and thanks for the report. > > > > By the way, do you have the configure.log file available from the build? > > That would help my diagnosis of the problem. > > No, sorry. But I could re-run a build, if really necessary. I think Stephan Kramer's report in bug 484341 identified the problem. The hypre package was buggy. (I think the source is a problematic atlas package...) I'll upload a fix tonight. > > <rant>I have to say, it is not helpful to tag something "FTBFS on i386" > > when that is in fact not the case. It builds just fine in unstable on > > i386. And to test your assertion regarding gcc-4.3, I need to dig into > > the non-standard build system of my package to discover its C compiler > > option, or perhaps install gcc-defaults from experimental. > > > > A more sensible approach would be to transition gcc and friends first, > > then file the bugs. If these bugs are supposed to be "serious" for > > lenny, then let's make them so. I've been waiting for months for this > > transition to happen on i386 (and amd64), and meanwhile fixing bugs > > which come with patches. What's the reason for the delay, cf. the rush > > to file "serious" bugs?</rant> > > I've been waiting too, and most arches have transitioned to gcc-4.3. The > easiest way to test that bug would be to try to build petsc on another > architecture that already switched to gcc-4.3. Okay. Thanks again, and sorry about the rant. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
