On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:30:58AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 12:03:39AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:31:40PM +0300, Markus Laire wrote: > > > > > > I'm not a maintainer, but I did have info that bug had not been > > > dealt with, so I reopened the bug with that info. > > > > I see that you sent info, but only to the BTS control bot, which prevents it > > from being reflected in the bug log. > > > > I suggest you re-send it. > > Btw, as for this BTS ping-pong game, Max asked that you file separate bugs > instead of reopening this one. This doesn't sound like an unreasonable > request, so why not just do that?
Robert, i don't really see the reason why this should be done. > It's probably helpful to the maintainers to have a separate bug for each > violation. I can imagine that working with one [1] huge report while trying > to actually fix stuff can be a PITA. Well, i suppose that callign the reporter stupid, as max did is not helpful also. Nor threatenenign me to be blacklisted from the BTS. Max should really calm down, i know he is not agreeing with the firmware split, but this doesn't allow him to be impolite and threatening. I suppose the right way would be to split the bug report, and retitle it for each actual violation case, but hey ... > [1] well, actually a few merged reports, but it amounts to the same. Sadly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
