Package: statcvs Version: 0.3.dfsg-4 Severity: serious Hi,
The statcvs package lacks a source tarball in the archive since April 10. From ftp.debian.org: ------------------------------------------------------------ > ls -l -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 5959 Apr 10 22:17 statcvs_0.3.dfsg-4.diff.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 960 Apr 10 22:17 statcvs_0.3.dfsg-4.dsc -rw-rw-r-- 1 1176 1176 382608 Apr 10 22:17 statcvs_0.3.dfsg-4_all.deb ------------------------------------------------------------ I discussed this on #debian-devel and was told that I should file a bug against this package, Debbugs-Cc: to ftpmaster. Here's some relevant lines from IRC (removed a lot of noise and hopefully nothing too relevant): ------------------------------------------------------------ <SLi> Hi. There's a package without source in ftp.debian.org since April 10 (see debian/pool/main/s/statcvs/, the source tarball is missing). Should I file a bug against statcvs or ftp.debian.org? <Ganneff> did it move, the wrong way, from contrib/non-free to main? <azeem> Ganneff: yes <Ganneff> file a bug against the package, high severity, to upload a "new" upstream version <SLi> No bug against ftp.debian.org? <Ganneff> no. they can fix it pretty fast if they just upload a "new" upstream <Ganneff> rename the tarball to some +dfsg one <astronut> Ganneff: how did it happen? <Ganneff> astronut: bug in dak if you do the move wrongly <azeem> it's 0.3.dfsg anyway <astronut> ah <Ganneff> make it 0.3.dfsg1 <Ganneff> it only happens if the maintainer doesnt use -sa... (well. dak needs a fix, we know that) ------------------------------------------------------------ Sami -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature