On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:49:22PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: > On 18/03/2008, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:23:30PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>> checkbashisms' output: >>>> possible bashism in ./etc/init.d/capi4hylafax line 15 (local foo=bar): >>>> local SPOOL=/var/spool/hylafax/ >> It is still a serious bug, though, because according to policy only >> local a >> a=foo >> can be used and not >> local a=foo >> (Policy 10.4) > (...) some people have said that using bashisms in /bin/sh scripts > does not qualify for RC. > Based on the way I parse the RC policy for lenny[1] I would also say > that they are RC bugs, Ah, yes, I keep forgetting that the rules have changed and that not all should/must clauses of the Debian policy warrant serious severity anymore. The RC policy for lenny is mum on /bin/sh scripts; so in a way, it is up to the release managers. The point is becoming moot anyway, I'm fixing the bug now. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
