On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:21:17PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Petter and me tried to clarify this also as a feature and not >>> a bug. So I would regard this point as void and would like >>> to close the bug. If you don't think so please speak up now. >> >> It doesnt seem to work, according to the original bug report... > > Well, the original reporter raised three different points in > his bug report (filed three times :-() and I wonder which point > he regards as grave and especially why. If the reporter does > not answer questistions about his report I would downgrade > and set "moreinfo" tag at least.
I had some problems with mail getting to me. Things are now slowly being processed. I can't really follow everything that's happened with this. >From what I understand so far: cdd-dev would get a Depends on apt. I'm perfectly happy with that. I would consider that part of the bug to be serious. It's just downloading Packages files, while I thought it was actually downloading .deb's file. I clearly didn't properly read the build log. I don't have a problem with this part anymore. But I would like to suggest you use whatever is currently on the system (in /var/lib/apt/lists/). I don't see why you need to download it again. I think someone also cloned it to say it doesn't work if there is no network. That's probably a bug in cdd-dev then, and would also be serious. I have a problem with package that leave things behind after they've been removed and purged, or have build something. But I can't say that this is considered to be RC. Using the Packages file from the system would also solve that problem. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
