On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:45:53PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.2233 +0200]:
> > Why don't you generate the html-nochunks documentation anymore?
>
> No particular reason except that Roger's patch did not do so?
> Anyway, nochunks is really just a convenience thing (single page, as
> opposed to multiple page), so does it really matter? I give you that
> maybe nochunks would have been better than the html currently in
> there.
Hmm, before NMU: pdf, html, html-nochunks, txt
after NMU: html, txt
I would just readd the html-nochunks as it is an unecessary regression
to leave it out.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
