Your message dated Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:43:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#459026: libmail-cclient-perl: FTBFS: unmet b-dep 
libc-client-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: archmbox
version: 4.9.0-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080103 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.

Relevant part:

 > ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
 > Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), perl, psmisc, bzip2, uw-mailutils
 > Checking for already installed source dependencies...
 > debhelper: missing
 > Using default version 5.0.63
 > perl: already installed (5.8.8-12)
 > psmisc: missing
 > bzip2: missing
 > uw-mailutils: missing
 > Checking for source dependency conflicts...
 > Reading package lists...
 > Building dependency tree...
 > Reading state information...
 > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
 > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
 > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
 > or been moved out of Incoming.
 > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
 > 
 > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 >   uw-mailutils: Depends: libc-client2006j2 but it is not installable
 > E: Broken packages
 > apt-get failed.
 > Package installation failed
 > Trying to reinstall removed packages:
 > Trying to uninstall newly installed packages:
 > Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping archmbox

The full build log is available from:
        http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2008/01/03

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.

-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 04/01/08 at 19:19 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> clone 459026 -1
> reassign -1 uw-imap
> retitle -1 uw-imap: Make c-client -dev package unversioned if stable
> severity -1 minor
> thanks
> 
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on 
> >i386.
> 
> > > E: Couldn't find package libc-client-dev
> > > apt-get failed.
> > > Package installation failed
> 
> This is odd. libc-client-dev is a virtual package provided by 
> libc-clientXXX-dev which should be resolved by your build script. I know 
> for a fact that pbuilder used with cowdancer resolves the virtual 
> package properly.
> 
> What build system caused this error? I suspect the bug is in that build 
> system.

sbuild. But actually, the error was caused by a package not being
available yet in sid. I'm closing this bug and the related ones.

Sorry for the noise!
-- 
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to