Your message dated Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:59:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456646: aptitude: depends on libgcc1 from experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.10-1
aptitude 0.4.10-1 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:4.3),
which is only available in experimental.
--
Michał Politowski
Talking has been known to lead to communication if practiced carelessly.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:21:49AM +0100, Michal Politowski <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
>> aptitude 0.4.10-1 depends on libgcc1 (>= 1:4.3),
>> which is only available in experimental.
>
> Ow. So, release team, is the correct way of handling this without
> making everyone even more angry at me to do a binary-only rebuild?
Which is already built... so closing the bug...
Cheers
Luk
--- End Message ---
