Hello Simon,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:40:43PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > Michael: how would you recommend proceeding with this? Should I bother > asking for a sponsored-NMU of a known-broken package in the hope that it's > xmms2's fault, should I add the Recommends, should I file a separate bug for > the Recommends? I would be for a separate bug for the Recommends so the maintainer can add it and add some documentation in /usr/share/doc/abraca/README.Debian on this. > diff -u abraca-0.2/debian/changelog abraca-0.2/debian/changelog > --- abraca-0.2/debian/changelog > +++ abraca-0.2/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > +abraca (0.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low > + > + * Non-maintainer upload. > + * Use a temporary $HOME during build to stop waf writing outside the build > + directory (Closes: #439567). > + > + -- Simon McVittie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:47:31 +0000 > + Is using a temporary $HOME really such a good idea? What do you thin about just disabling/removing (via patch) the stuff in ./waf that needs $HOME? I'm not a python guy, so I cant help much here. Cheers, Michael
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
