On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, akira yamada / ?????? wrote:
Basically, we should not use RUBY_VERSION_CODE.
So I think that an approach likes the following patch is better.
...
Cool, nothing like do things the Right Way. There is just one problem:
renmazuo:/libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src# pwd
/libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src
renmazuo:/libdb4.3-ruby-0.5.8/src# grep -n RUBY_VERSION * | grep 190
common.c:1416:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190
common.c:3116:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190
common.c:3798:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190
common.c:3815:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190
recnum.c:584:#if RUBY_VERSION_CODE >= 190
The nmu that was made sometime ago used this variable, so this patch now needs
to change the constraints introduced by this nmu too.
I'll see if I can do something about this.
Cheers,
filipe {
@ icewall.org
GPG 1024D/A6BA423E
Jabber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
