Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:58:57PM +0000, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote: >> Sam Hocevar a écrit : >>> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: >>> >>>> Could you please avoid sending NMU's diff to an active maintainer ? >>>> >>> Adam, being aggressive towards beginners taking part to a bug >>> squashing party and trying to learn and improve Debian is not >>> tolerable. >>> >>> Stop objecting to NMUs and considering them an accusation of being >>> MIA. That's not what NMUs are, they are just a way to improve Debian. >>> >>> And do not claim you are active if you can devote energy to oppose >>> an NMU, yet do not apply a trivial patch (#368505) that fixes a serious >>> boot time breakage and has been sitting here for one year and a half. >>> >>> >> Hi Sam, >> >> It wasn't aggressive, at least for me it wasn't. > > You definitely looked like it. > >> I just didn't understand at all why someone wanted to upload a NMU with a >> broken patch while I was aware of the issue and planned to work on it. >> A fixed package has now been uploaded, that really fix the issue. >> >> [...] >> >> Could you please tell me how would you have reacted if someone wanted to >> upload a broken NMU for a package you're maintaining ? > > Common practice to avoid this situation is to answer in the bug log so > that everybody knows you're working on it. If not, then expect someone > to NMU if your bug is more than 10 days old. > > I would not blame someone that does a NMU if that's because I was: > (1) silent on the bug log ; > (2) letting an RC (or even to some extent some important bugs) open > for a very long time on one of my packages. > > It does not means you can't explain to the NMUer why he/she was wrong > so that next time he/she knows better. But a NMU is not an aggressive > act. Stop being an alpha-male please. > > >> Both are responsible of this glitch, it's not only my fault... > > It is. 0 Day NMU policy applies for RC bugs and Release Goals bugs > after 10 days. Get used to it. >
Once again (and it'll be my last answer on this fixed bug reported), the bug was only 7 days old, and the proposed NMU was broken. Moreover, I'm not the fuse maintainer, if you don't like my work and think you're better, go ahead and add yourself to fuse uploaders. Regards, Adam.