On Tue Sep 18 22:11, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > My script doesn't file any bug. I dunno why you think so. All bugs are > filed manually.
Sorry, it did just look a lot like refiling the same bug, and I made an assumption. > Your package failed to build again in a sid chroot updated yesterday. In > the same chroot, libcsv-java, libgtk-java, and gcj-4.2 built fine (all > of them used to fail because of gjdoc). libcsv-java uses dh_javadoc, whereas libmatthew-java generates it in the upstream makefile which is then installed in a separate package. The upstream makefile _does_ use the -link option pointed at the online sun documentation. I did try and override it to point to local documentation from the dependencies, but it seems I failed, I'll rewrite the way it's done upstream, which should mask this issue, but I still think there is a bug in gjdoc. I tried using sun java 6 version of javadoc, and that merely produces a warning about failure to connect to the url. I think gjdoc's behaviour is a bug, particularly with the two different errors, only one of which is fatal. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
