Your message dated Mon, 3 Sep 2007 07:19:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432878: pari: FTBFS with gcc-4.2: Tests run long then fail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: pari
Version: 2.3.2-1
Severity: important
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.2
From my pbuilder build log on i386, using a chroot with packages mostly from
sid, except that gcc-defaults is from experimental:
...
/usr/bin/make dobench -C obj-dyn
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/pari-2.3.2/obj-dyn'
* Testing objets for gp-dyn..BUG [508535]
* Testing analyz for gp-dyn..TIME=52
* Testing number for gp-dyn..BUG [44]
* Testing polyser for gp-dyn..BUG [707892]
* Testing linear for gp-dyn..BUG [304]
* Testing elliptic for gp-dyn..../src/test/dotest: line 68: 12952
Terminated $gp -q --test <$file_in >$file_test 2>&1
BUG [0]
* Testing sumiter for gp-dyn..BUG [36]
* Testing graph for gp-dyn..BUG [16]
* Testing program for gp-dyn..BUG [36]
* Testing trans for gp-dyn..BUG [9876]
* Testing nfields for gp-dyn..../src/test/dotest: line 68: 13000
Terminated $gp -q --test <$file_in >$file_test 2>&1
BUG [0]
+++ [BUG] Total bench for gp-dyn is 1226791
PROBLEMS WERE NOTED. The following files list them in diff format:
Directory: /tmp/buildd/pari-2.3.2/obj-dyn
objets-dyn.dif
number-dyn.dif
polyser-dyn.dif
linear-dyn.dif
elliptic-dyn.dif
sumiter-dyn.dif
graph-dyn.dif
program-dyn.dif
trans-dyn.dif
nfields-dyn.dif
make[1]: *** [dobench] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/pari-2.3.2/obj-dyn'
make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2
(I admit that I got tired of waiting for the tests towards the end and
killed the gp-dyn processes by hand.)
--
Daniel Schepler
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Friday 31 August 2007 08:27:21 am Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello Daniel, could you retry it ?
> I investigated this bug when you reported it and it looked really like a
> compiler bug (incorrect optimisation of code involving __asm__).
>
> I retried it with gcc 4.2.1-2 and the test-suite complete fine now.
Thanks, it appears you're right. I'm therefore closing the bug now.
--
Daniel Schepler
--- End Message ---