On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 11:38 +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:30:40AM -0400, Ethan Glasser-Camp wrote:
> > It seems as though muse is linked against liblash.so.1, though the
> > liblash2 package only provides liblash.so.2. Below are the commands I
> > used to come to this conclusion; if I'm grievously mistaken, please
> > let me know. Thanks for your time!
> 
> You are correct, and I assume this is what "Fixed library version
> problem" in lash's changelog entry for the most recent upload means. In
> other words, all packages built with liblash-dev 0.5.3-1 need to be
> rebuilt. Günther, is my understanding correct?

Yes, correct. Definitely my fault and I should have advised the 
maintainers of possibly affected packages about this problem. 
I am trying to figure out the steps I can take currently, but basically
recompiling the package should fix the problem.

Günter

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Daniel.
> 
> 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to