Your message dated Thu, 5 May 2005 11:48:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DRBD kernel binary modules not in archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 11:29:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 04:29:04 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.ganneff.de (ganneff.de) [213.146.108.162]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DN7xX-00030C-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 04:29:04 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganneff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F326E016E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:29:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ganneff.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (goliath2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 14383-01-3 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from vorlon.ganneff.de (ganneff.ganneff.de [213.146.108.163])
by ganneff.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C9EE0161
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:29:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: drbd: Package Fails to build from Source in a sane way
Organization: Goliath-BBS
X-Debbugs-CC: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-GPG-ID: 0x7E7B8AC9
X-GPG-FP: DF7D EB2F DB28 FD2B A9FB FA6D 715E D6A0 7E7B 8AC9
X-message-flag: Formating hard disk. please wait... 10%... 20%...
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:29:00 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ganneff.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: drbd
Severity: serious
Hi
You may also refer to #300683 for some more mails around this, but below
are the most important informations.
The way the package builts isnt acceptable for the modules. Please fix
the build-system so that a single dpkg-buildpackage is enough, or please
dont get the modules for different kernels in the archive, it isnt
suupportable security-wise. Package needs to built everything with one
call, and as such have everything in the "main" debian/control (and that
SHOULD NOT be edited on the fly, just for the record).
=2D---- Forwarded message from Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:41:43 +0100
From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Explanation
Michael Banck:
The package builds fine like that, it's just the additional kernel
modules which need to be built by a different script, AIUI
Steve Langasek:
well, here's the thing. the source package does build if you run
the normal debian/rules commands; but those binary packages that are
built do *not* include the kernel-specific modules packages. So you
have to go through an additional step to build the per-kernel module
packages, which are not listed in debian/control but are present in
the archive.
me:
We cannot support this security-wise.
Apart from that the package apparently fails to build from source
(FTBFS) if
make -f debian/rules build
sudo make -f debian/rules binary
doesn't produce all required binary packages that should end up in
the archive.
This is surely release-critical.
Regards,
Joey
=2D---- End forwarded message -----
=2D-=20
bye Joerg
<liw> I'm kinky and perverse, but my illness is laziness
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Debian Developer
iD8DBQBCYkh8cV7WoH57iskRAuE+AJ9WCe+1QM8piIfy9q6+/NbpU2mhsQCgh/AM
HfMPxbh9124V8UZ6DFlyKDU=
=5Gv2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305028-done) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2005 09:48:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 05 02:48:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shopwall.abacus.ch [193.246.120.14]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTcy2-0000tC-00; Thu, 05 May 2005 02:48:26 -0700
Received: from postman.abacus.ch by shopwall.abacus.ch
via smtpd (for spohr.debian.org [140.211.166.43]) with ESMTP; Thu, 5
May 2005 11:48:16 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by postman.abacus.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id C033312F893
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 May 2005 11:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from postman.abacus.ch ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (postman [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 14602-03-5 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 5 May 2005 11:48:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.1.128] (zux006-055-217.adsl.green.ch [81.6.55.217])
by postman.abacus.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id C585812F891
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 5 May 2005 11:48:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Philipp Hug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DRBD kernel binary modules not in archive
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 11:48:11 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at abacus.ch
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
the kernel binary modules are not in the archive. so this bug doesn't apply...
when we find a solution that satisfies the requirements in this bug we'll
re-add the binary modules. but this will be post-sarge
philipp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
