On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:23:14AM +0200, Eric Heintzmann wrote: > >>>With the attached patch, 'addresses-for-gnustep' can be compiled > >>>on i386/testing. There is a new version of addresses-for-gnustep > >>>in sid which already has this patch applied, but which will probably > >>>not enter sarge because of #304968.
> >>#304968 will be closed when gnustep-back will be a valid candidate (in 2
> >>days).
> >gnustep-back is a valid candidate tomorrow; you ought to close this bug
> >now.
> What bug should I close now :
> #304968 (gnustep-base)
> or #307290 (addresses-for-gnustep)
> or both ?
If what you want is for gnustep-{base,back,gui} to go in when gnustep-back
is a valid candidate, then you should close 304968 now.
And then 307290 can be closed once they're all accepted into testing.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
