Your message dated Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:09:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx
Severity: serious
Justification: 2

nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-1.0.9631 is currently not available in the
archive, and since nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx depends on it, the package is
not installable.

thanks for the hard work.

mike

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (400, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.5-9+b1   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libx11-6                      2:1.0.3-7  X11 client-side library
ii  libxext6                      1:1.0.3-2  X11 miscellaneous extension librar
pn  nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-1.0 <none>     (no description available)
ii  x11-common                    1:7.2-3    X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc

nvidia-glx-legacy-96xx recommends no packages.


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
> why not include pre-built binary packages for the legacy nvidia kernel
> driver as is done with the standard nvidia kernel driver?
If you're implying that Debian decided not to distribute pre-built nvidia 
legacy 96xx LKM packages, I suggest you provide a reference, because I never 
heard that.

Please do not reopen this bug again, unless you can defend that it is valid.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to