tags 425781 pending tags 425813 pending thanks Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sam, 26 Mai 2007, Norbert Preining wrote: >> So in fact this *IS* enough as it is by now, do you agree? Yes. >> I checked in the following code: >> if [ -f "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" ]; then >> echo "It looks like $cfgfile has been removed." >> echo "In most cases this is a consequence of bug #420390." >> echo "We are reinstatiating this config file." >> echo "If you *really* want this to be removed, do it again," >> echo "but beware of the consequences." >> echo "" >> #mv "$cfgfile" "$cfgfile.dpkg-new" >> rm "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" >> fi >> >> If someone wants to add some debconf magic (I would prefer to do it >> without...), please! > > I added a close clause to the texlive-bin package closing the > texlive-bin bug. > > After the upload of texlive-bin -10 we should close the -base bug by > hand, since no further -base upload is necessary. Agreed. > Or we push up the texlive-full/texlive dependency and texlive-common > conflict to a higher level and upload also -base. But this is useless > since all is in unstable for now, and we don't have to deal with > intermediate packages in testing. > > Frank, could you upload texlive-bin this week and close the base bug > afterwards... Yes, I'll do that. Surely not today or on Sunday, probably on Monday, maybe a bit later. Regards, Frank -- Dr. Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
