Hi. From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Bug#299762: jadetex: Does not preserve user changes upon upgrade Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:37:56 -0800 > This means that if /etc/texmf/fmt.d/40jadetex.cnf has been removed, which is > a valid state for a conffile to be in, upgrades of the package will fail. > Is this the desired behavior? If not, should this "elif" also be removed > from the script, or should 40jadetex.cnf be restored IFF it's missing (in > which case, it should not be a conffile)?
I think this is not desired, right? I should remove this 'elif' section. Thanks. ---- OHURA Makoto: [EMAIL PROTECTED](Debian Project) [EMAIL PROTECTED](LILO/Netfort) GnuPG public key: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~ohura/gpg.asc.txt fingerprint: 54F6 D1B1 2EE1 81CD 65E3 A1D3 EEA2 EFA2 77DC E083 http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~ohura/
pgpeik8UD15sg.pgp
Description: PGP signature