On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:11:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: [...]
> Sarge and sid have the same SDL version. You are basically comparing
> libsdl1.2debian-all and libsdl1.2debian-oss.
Yes you're right. I didn't notice that I'm using -all on my box.
> > Any reason for such huge disproportions? That's where we got libglib2.0.
> > Scorched3D built on sarge works fine and doesn't link against libglib2.0.
>
> That's an indirect dependency (brought by libarts), that you won't see
> if you pass --as-needed to ld. However, this is not enough, as users
> having libsdl1.2debian-{all,arts} installed will still get this
> dependency at runtime, probably leading to segfaults.
So I suppose that Conflicts: libsdl1.2debian-{all,arts} isn't a solution?
ARTS users won't be able to use Scorched3D then :/
> > Also seems that other distros have wxgtk2.4 linked against libglib2.0 and
> > libsdl doesn't linked against any libglib.
> > This way most other distros have scorched3d linked against libglib2.0, but
> > only because wxgtk2.4 and not libsdl.
>
> This may be because they are building a GTK+2.0 version of libwxgtk2.4.
>
> > I'm not sure what to do now. Is it possible to link our wxgtk2.4 against
> > glib2.0? Or unlink libsdl from using libglib?
>
> I'm afraid there is no miracle solution. Getting wxgtk2.5 to install
> together with wxgtk2.4, if possible, would be a good option. IIRC, it's
> possible to rebuild WxWidgets 2.4 against GTK+ 2.x, but it requires
> changes in the applications because of the move to UTF8.
Hmm, so I wonder how it's done in other distros where wxwidgets uses
gtk2.x. Or maybe they don't use `apt-cache rdepends libwxgtk2.4`?
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32-050 Skawina - Glowackiego 3/15 - w. malopolskie - Poland
`. `' phone:+48602383548 | proud Debian maintainer and user
`- http://skawina.eu.org | jid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rlu:172001
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
