Your message dated Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:56:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 09:29:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 01:29:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DCDnL-000462-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:29:27 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
        by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6635575DE
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-82-135-4-70.mnet-online.de [82.135.4.70])
        by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A24E5E63A
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) 
[+prerelease])
        id 1DCDnC-000337-GT
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:18 +0100
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:29:18 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTBFS in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: postgresql-7.4
Version: 1:7.4.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Hi,
please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=postgresql-7.4
for the full build log

Cheers,
Andi

Automatic build of postgresql-7.4_1:7.4.7-1 on notos by sbuild/powerpc 1.170.5
Build started at 20050318-0210
******************************************************************************
[...]
Checking correctness of source dependencies...
Toolchain package versions: libc6-dev_2.3.2.ds1-20 
linux-kernel-headers_2.5.999-test7-bk-17 gcc-3.3_1:3.3.5-8 g++-3.3_1:3.3.5-6 
binutils_2.15-5 libstdc++5_1:3.3.5-6 libstdc++5-3.3-dev_1:3.3.5-6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
dpkg-source: extracting postgresql-7.4 in postgresql-7.4-7.4.7
[...]
make -C ../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl all
make[5]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpgtcl'
make -C ../../../src/interfaces/libpq all
make[6]: Entering directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpq'
make[6]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[6]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpq'
make[5]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd/postgresql-7.4-7.4.7/build-tree/postgresql-7.4.7/src/interfaces/libpgtcl'
cc -g -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -I../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4  -c -o pgtclAppInit.o pgtclAppInit.c
cc -g -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations pgtclAppInit.o -L../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl 
-lpgtcl -L../../../src/interfaces/libpq -lpq -L/usr/lib -ltcl8.4 -ldl -lpthread 
-lieee -lm -L../../../src/port  -lpam -lssl -lcrypto -lkrb5 -lz -lreadline 
-lcrypt -lresolv -lnsl -ldl -lm  -lpgport -o pgtclsh
cc -g -Wall -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes 
-Wmissing-declarations -I../../../src/interfaces/libpgtcl  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4 -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE  
-I/usr/include/tcl8.4  -c -o pgtkAppInit.o pgtkAppInit.c
In file included from pgtkAppInit.c:15:
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:96:29: X11/Xlib.h: No such file or directory
In file included from pgtkAppInit.c:15:
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: error: syntax error before "Window"
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`Window'
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: error: `Window' declared as function returning a 
function
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:572: warning: parameter names (without types) in 
function declaration
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:575: error: syntax error before "XEvent"
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:584: error: syntax error before "Tk_ClassCreateProc"
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:584: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:592: error: syntax error before '}' token
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:592: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`Tk_ClassProcs'
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:592: warning: data definition has no type or storage 
class
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:678: error: syntax error before "Bool"
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:678: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:679: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of 
`display'
/usr/include/tcl8.4/tk.h:679: warning: data definition has no type or storage 
class
[...]

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300185-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 17:56:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 21 09:56:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DDR8d-0006XL-00; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:56:27 -0800
Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr20.m-online.net [192.168.3.148])
        by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC3876CA;
        Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:56:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sol.so.argh.org (ppp-62-245-161-30.mnet-online.de 
[62.245.161.30])
        by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179A460A9E;
        Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:56:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aba by sol.so.argh.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian) 
[+prerelease])
        id 1DDR8U-00074b-Ip; Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:56:18 +0100
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:56:18 +0100
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kenshi Muto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#300185: FTBFS in experimental
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 14:34]:
> * Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050321 14:30]:
> > I experienced same case on my arm experimental buildd.
> > The problem of my case was caused by broken xfree86-common
> > (uninstallation failed). Andreas, did you check it?

> I'll check the chroot and re-queue the package and see if it fails
> again.

I'm going to hide under some rock now. Closing the bug report, worked
after requeueing.


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to