Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote Sun, Mar 20, 2005: > Package: elinks > Followup-For: Bug #296976 > > #296976 is marked as serious against elinks. However, it seems to me > that it's just the sgml2x package not using the right option when > calling elinks. > > Should this really prevent elinks 0.10.2-2 from getting into sarge?
Looks like it has actually been closed, but that the bts cannot parse the ``closes'' tag? Snip from the diff.gz of the sgml2x package: +sgml2x (1.0.0-9) unstable; urgency=low + + * Call links with -no-home flag to avoid failure when building in a + chroot (Closes: #296976 but I hate this - looks like bad behaviour + from elinks). + + -- Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:11:39 +0100 I remember noticing some other unclosed ELinks bugs that the changelog tried to close. Snip from the Debian changelog for the elinks package: * Fix rules to use /etc/elinks for configure (closes: #267962) -- Jonas Fonseca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
