On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 06:55:30PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > reassign 299223 iptables > why? Because I originally thought it looked like the grave iptables bug (tagged woody), but when I reread it with the reporter's iptables version included, I realized that it was improbable (though it still may be an iptables problem). I've already reassigned it back.
Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
